Articles by Date

A Christogenea commentary On the Gospel of John has recently been completed. Many passages simply do not say what the modern churches think they mean! Don't miss this important and ground-breaking work proving that Christian Identity is indeed fully supported by Scripture.

A Commentary on Genesis is now being presented. Here we endeavor to explain the very first book of the Christian Bible from a perspective which reconciles both the Old and New Testaments with archaeology and ancient history, through eyes which have been opened by the Gospel of Christ.

A Commentary on the Epistles of Paul has been completed at Christogenea.org. This lengthy and in-depth series reveals the true Paul as an apostle of God, a prophet in his own right, and the first teacher of what we call Christian Identity.

Don't miss our recently-completed series of commentaries on the Minor Prophets of the Bible, which has also been used as a vehicle to prove the historicity of the Bible as well as the Provenance of God.

Visit Clifton Emahiser's Watchman's Teaching Ministries at Christogenea.org for his many foundational Christian Identity studies.

Christogenea Books: Christian Truths in Black and White!
Visit our store at Christogenea.com.

Looking for something? Click here to view a listing of titles only.

Christianity is not evil, Islam is Evil! Where is the outrage?

Submitted by William Finck on

The largest mosque in Europe recently opened in the Netherlands. As more and more Muslims are granted entry into Europe - or simply enter whether or not they are permitted, the Muslims will get more and more brazen. Pictured here is a billboard advertisement put out by Muslims in Britain attacking not only Christmas, but Christianity itself. Yet when some Jew prints a cartoon depicting Mohammed in a newspaper, the Muslims go berserk and start slaughtering Christians in the streets, while the Jewish-controlled media finds a way to put even the blame for that upon Christians. WHY do Christians let them get away with such behavior? Do Christians - or even White Europeans who don't care about religion - not care at all about their own race or society? Or the futures of their own sons and daughters, nieces and nephews?

The religion of Islam has always been one of conquest and forced conversion and submission. As recently as the 1680's, the Muslim Turks had Vienna under siege. It still is a religion of conquest. The Jewish media has lied to Europeans, proclaiming that Islam is a "religion of peace". Why do the Jews make that proclamation in reference to Europe and America, but they do not make that proclamation in reference to Syria, Iraq, or Palestine? Islam is hardly a religion of peace. It has never rested until it is either forced to rest through military defeat, or until it has prevailed through violence. Just observe what has happened in Somalia, Southeast Asia, India and Pakistan, or anywhere else there are peoples of other religions neighboring Islamic tribes and countries, and not only Christians but Hindus, Buddhists and others. With Islam, there is no choice and no "democracy". If you do not stand up and defend Western Culture - and demand that your political leaders defend Western culture - then in 20 years you will all be slaves to the mullahs.

Sura_9_5_says.flv — Downloaded 986 times
Sura_9_5_says.mp4 — Downloaded 4661 times

Clifton Emahiser on the prophecy concerning television found in the first Book of Adam and Eve (From WTL #66)

Submitted by William Finck on

There will probably be those who will scoff at any reference to the three books of Adam And Eve, but it should be pointed out from the start that the 1st, 2nd and 3rd books of Adam And Eve are mostly allegorical and prophetic in nature, and cannot be taken in a literal sense. If they are taken at their face value, less than 5% can be comprehended. I will give you an example of such a case. In the 27th chapter of the first book of Adam And Eve we read the following: “1 When Satan, the hater of all good, saw how they continued in prayer, and how God communed with them, and comforted them, and how He had accepted their offering — Satan made an apparition. 2 He began with transforming his hosts; in his hands was a flashing fire, and they were in a great light. 3 He then placed his throne near the mouth of the cave because he could not enter into it by reason of their prayers. And he shed light into the cave, until the cave glistened over Adam and Eve; while his hosts began to sing praises. 4 And Satan did this, in order that when Adam saw the light, he should think within himself that it was a heavenly light, and that Satan’s hosts were angels; and that God had sent them to watch at the cave, and to give him light in the darkness. 5 So that when Adam came out of the cave and saw them, and Adam and Eve bowed to Satan, then he would overcome Adam thereby, and a second time humble him before God, 6 When, therefore, Adam and Eve saw the light, fancying it was real, they strengthened their hearts; yet, as they were trembling, Adam said to Eve:— 7 ‘Look at that great light, and at those many songs of praise, and at that host standing outside that do not come in to us, do not tell us what they say, or whence they come, or what is the meaning of this light; what those praises are; wherefore they have been sent hither, and why they do not come in.’”

CNN Caught in Blatant Lie - What Else Do They Lie About?

Submitted by William Finck on

Here CNN is caught in a blatant lie, which they purposely broadcast. The network used creative editing to filter out the words of a rabid negress.The original rant given by Sherelle Smith urged negros not to bring violence to their own neighborhood, but rather to bring their violence to the suburbs. Sherelle Smith is the sister of the thug who was recently killed by a negro cop after pointing a gun at him. The incident was caught on tape, and there is no doubt the shooting was legally justifiable. CNN clipped out a few seconds of the video and tossed the rest, in order to portray the criminal as a peacemaker. How can CNN ever be trusted? What else do they so readily lie about? How many American lives are affected every day by CNN lies?

There has been news that CNN apologized for this incident. But in fact, CNN only appears to have apologized. Their 'apology' means nothing because it did not admit the nature of their dishonest act. The original act was not merely an omission, but a deceitful lie and purposeful mischaracterization of what was said, for the purpose of distorting news in the advancement of the network's own political agenda. Their 'apology' is sort of like robbing and killing someone, and apologizing for misplacing their wallet.

The only acceptable apology CNN could make in an instance such as this, is to fire everyone involved, and now - after two weeks - to fire their bosses for not firing them in the first place.

CNN edits sister of shooting suspect urging protesters to bu.mp4 — Downloaded 8279 times

Comments on Interracial Crime

Submitted by William Finck on

Comments on Interracial Crime by Jared Taylor

"Because interracial rape is now overwhelmingly black on white, it has become difficult to do research on it or to find relevant statistics. The FBI keeps very detailed national records on crime, but the way it presents rape data obscures the racial element rather than clarifies it." --Source: Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America (New York: Carrol & Graf, 1992), Pages 92-93:

"When whites do violence - rape, murder, assault - how often do they choose black victims? Shouldnft a nation of bigots target blacks most of the time? At least half of the time? Of course, it does not. When whites commit violence, they do it to blacks 2.4 percent of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose white victims more than half the time. (n.317)

In those cases in which the race of the killer is known, blacks kill twice as many whites as whites kill blacks. Black-on-white robberies and gang assaults are twenty-one times more common than white on black. In the case of gang robbery, blacks victimize whites fifty-two times more often than whites do blacks. (n318)

The contrasts are even more stark in the case of interracial rape. Studies from the late 1950s showed that the vast majority of rapes were same-race offenses. Research in Philadelphia carried out in 1958 and 1960 indicated that of all rapes, only 3.2 percent were black-on-white assaults and 3.6 percent were white-on-black. Since that time, the proportion of black-on-white rapes has soared. In a 1974 study in Denver, 40 percent of all rapes were of whites by blacks, and not one case of white-on-black rape was found. In general, through the 1970s, black-on-white rape was at least ten times more common that white-on-black rape. (n.319)

Cooperation of Government and Freemasonry

Submitted by William Finck on

Michael Hoffman recently wrote an article announcing that the “Prominent Washington D.C. Monument to Masonic Confederate General Albert Pike is untouched”. The issue is not new to us. However the question he may have asked is why Washington D.C. ever had a monument to a Confederate general in the first place. Of the eighteen Civil War-related monuments in the U.S. capital, there are no others dedicated to figures of the Confederacy. But why should there be one to Albert Pike?

A look into the history of the Pike monument in Washington reveals that it was planned, commissioned, and paid for by Scottish Right Freemasons. When a group representing Union soldiers found that its erection in the capital was planned, they protested to Congress, but Congress nevertheless approved of its placement within the city, “after Masons assured them it would depict Pike as a civilian, not a soldier” [Jacob, Kathryn Allamong (1998). Testament to Union: Civil War Monuments in Washington, D.C. JHU Press: JHU Press. pp. 59–62]....

Disdaining the Culture of Fear

Submitted by William Finck on

There are extant accounts from the tenth century - over a thousand years ago - that many Christians thought the end of the age would come with the end of the first millennium. Actually, there were dozens of times during the first thousand years from the birth of Christ that such predictions came and went. Other popular dates for the end of the world were 1666 and 1715. The year 1715 was actually conjectured by a man as brilliant as Isaac Newton himself, for it was found in one of his notebooks. (See http://www.bible.ca/pre-date-setters.htm or a copy of the text at Once Predicted End-Times Dates.) In the 19th century a certain preacher who was an early leader of the “Seventh-Day Adventist” cult made a series of predictions, based on certain interpretations of numbers found in the Bible, claiming that the return of Yahshua Christ and the end of this wicked age would transpire in 1844. Needless to say, today, a hundred and sixty-six years later, we are still waiting. Yet many other cults have made similar predictions since then, and they have all gone by the wayside, while few call the leaders of those cults into account – and those calls are almost always ignored.

Divorce in the Bible

Submitted by William Finck on

[view:podcasts_by_category=divorce]

Many so-called Bible scholars attempt to draw a distinction between the phrase “put away” and the word “divorce”, to assert that these two words mean something different, when in reality they are both often used in relation to the act of a man divorcing a wife. And by making a distinction between these two terms, many of these men even take it so far as to justify divorce, as if it were an acceptable practice. At the same time, those same men also often misconstrue the relationship of marriage, divorce, and remarriage that Yahweh has with his people Israel in the Old and New Covenants.

Dublin Today

Submitted by William Finck on

Jeremiah 31:27-30 27 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast. 28 And it shall come to pass, that like as I have watched over them, to pluck up, and to break down, and to throw down, and to destroy, and to afflict; so will I watch over them, to build, and to plant, saith the LORD. 29 In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge.

DublinToday.mp4 — Downloaded 2589 times

Dumbest Quotes

Submitted by William Finck on

Dumbest quote seen in all of 2009:

On the Forum at Christogenea.org, in a post by a guy calling himself Dan, dated October 16th:

"I also believe Noah's wife, whom he took onto the ark, was a Serpent Seed, but, that she was NOT the mother of his three son Shem, Ham and Japheth."

Well Dan, this is DUMB. You are also accusing Noah, who was chosen by Yahweh because he was NOT a race-mixer, of BEING a race-mixer!!! How are you not a blasphemer?

Pages