In language, so far as I have ever seen, the simple noun never gets its origin from the more complex noun. Rather, it is the simple noun which lends itself as a stem forming more complex words.
The Jews, making the assertion that adam (man, 120) comes from adamah (soil, 127), defy all language logic.
The word adam has several uses, so James Strong separated them with distinct entries in his lexicon.
119 adam, verb, to be ruddy, flush, show blood in the face
120 adam, noun, man
121 Adam, proper name
122 adam, adjective, rosy, ruddy
123 Edom, proper name, same word as Adam (another story entirely...)
124 odem, noun, redness
But all of these are the exact same original word, once we discard the rabbinical vowel pointing which was invented relatively recently.
The more complex words, adamah (127) and adamdam (125), must have come from these words, and not the other way around.
And there is only one other even more basic word that all of these words must have come from, which also explains why they all basically mean "red" but are also related to the ruddiness or rosy color of a man:
1818 dam, noun, blood.
Adam means ruddy or rosy because dam means blood. Then by extension, adamah refers to reddish-colored soil because adam means ruddy or red, like blood. Not even Strong made this connection correctly, as he too was probably influenced by the rabbis.
The Jews know this, but they are purposely lying to hide the true meaning of the word ADAM.
