A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 58: Promises of Comfort

Isaiah 54:9 - 55:13

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 58: Promises of Comfort

The first portion of our discussion of Isaiah chapter 54 had primarily focused on the promise to the children of Israel which is made here in verse 3, that they would “... break forth on the right hand and on the left”, where we had spoken about the expansion of their οἰκουμένη or dwelling space, and “thy seed shall inherit the [Nations], and make the desolate cities to be inhabited,” where we hope to have explained how the Adamic nations of Genesis chapter 10, at least those which had survived to this point in history, would ultimately be dominated and subsumed by the many nations which had been promised to come of the children of Israel. By the time of Christ, there were scarcely any of the original nations of Genesis chapter 10 which remained in any recognizable form, even if there were pockets of people who had retained their original names. The people who ruled the world at the time of His ministry, chiefly the Romans, Parthians, Phoenicians and Scythians, which would include both Gauls and Germans, had mainly descended from the children of Israel, and they were unheard of at the time when Yahweh had made promises and covenants for Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Parthians and Scythians, Germans and Gauls were still unheard of when Isaiah had first begun to write his book of prophecy, before 743 BC. 

As a digression, over the course of our studies these past 25 or so years, many friends have asked questions concerning the fate of those other Adamic nations, imagining them to still be with us today, and ostensibly many of them are, in one way or another but not by their original names. Many of their descendants may be among people of European descent, but it does not really matter, and this is why it does not matter: because Abraham was promised to be The Heir of the World, as Paul of Tarsus had described him in Romans chapter 4, and those words must have been at least partly inspired by this promise here in Isaiah, that Israel would “inherit the nations”. Nations are people groups, and not geographical entities. The desolate cities may have been considered desolate by Yahweh simply because they had not His law, living in the decadence which may justly be associated with varieties of ancient paganism. For this reason we read in verse 5 of the chapter, in reference to Yahweh: “The God of the whole earth shall he be called”, because Abraham is the heir of the world and Israel will inhabit the whole earth. In the Christian era, for better or worse, for right or wrong, all European nations ultimately accepted Christianity, and Yahweh certainly is considered the “God of the whole earth”. Of course, the unfortunate aspect of that is that the goats are often led to believe that they can somehow become sheep, but Christ had also warned that the wheat and the tares must coexist until the time of the end, and Isaiah will warn of that same thing here in chapter 56 of his prophecy, but in a somewhat different manner.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 57: The Heir of the World

Isaiah 54:1-8

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 57: The Heir of the World

From Genesis chapter 12 and the initial promises to Abraham, and throughout the Bible to the very end of the Book of Revelation, the entirety of Scripture may be summarized in one simple declaration: on account of the Word of God, the seed of Abraham through Jacob were given promises that they would ultimately inherit and inhabit the entire earth. There are more general promises to the entire race of Adam, and the Adamic man was created to be immortal, as the Scripture inform us, however these issues are peripheral to the more immediate promises made to this one man and his family, as we shall also see here in Isaiah chapter 54, and the the focal point of the apostles of Christ is the fulfillment of the promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. 

Here in Isaiah, as well as in the other books of the prophets, it is evident that these promises were never retracted or nullified, and they were never transferred to any other people. In their captivity, the children of Israel would become those many nations which had been promised to Abraham as well as in subsequent promises made to his wife Sarah, and to Isaac, Rebekah and Jacob. As Paul had written in Romans chapter 9, the children of Isaac through Jacob are counted as the seed of Abraham which is destined to inherit the promises. There Paul had repeated the promise to Abraham that “In Isaac shall thy seed be called” and then he attested that “the children of the promise are counted for the seed.” So the seed of the inheritance which is in Christ was determined in the promises to Abraham in Genesis, which Christ had come to fulfill. 

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 56: The Suffering Servant

Isaiah 53:1-12

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 56: The Suffering Servant

The figure who is described here in Isaiah chapters 52 and 53 is commonly called the Suffering Servant by Christians in general, and they correctly and appropriately identify that servant with Yahshua Christ, as the apostles of Christ had also done in their epistles and Gospel accounts. Many of the longstanding, traditional interpretations of the words of the prophets are correct, however quite sadly they are only correct in relation to certain aspects of those prophecies, and then they have accepted a false narrative of the consequences of their fulfillment in other aspects.

This prophecy of the suffering servant cannot be separated from its context within a prophesy of the announcement of the Gospel of Christ, but it also cannot be separated from the call which we had seen in Isaiah chapter 52, for the people of the captivities of Israel to touch not the unclean, and to come out from among them, which is evidently a reference to the people of the nations to where they had been scattered. We had seen that in 2 Corinthians chapter 6, Paul of Tarsus had interpreted that passage and beckoned Christians of his time to separate themselves from all those who did not have and follow the calling of Christ, to be separate from all of those who had not been cleansed on the cross of Christ. This is how the ancient Israelites spread abroad, the true children of God, were separated from His enemies and from all the bastards in the ancient Roman world in the early centuries of Christianity.

As a digression, the acceptance and organization of the churches in the councils of the time of Constantine and subsequent emperors, which resulted in the emergence of the later Roman Catholic Church in the 6th century and with the laws of Justinian, of which the eastern Orthodox churches had also been a part, was a vastly different, imperial form of Christianity which is contrary to Christ, which redefined the meanings of many Biblical terms, and which ignored or dismissed the meanings of most of the words of the prophets. So neither Roman Catholicism nor modern Orthodoxy have ever truly been Christian.

Sven Longshanks: Not Quite Free

Sven Longshanks: Not Quite Free

Now I have an addendum for this podcast before presenting it at Christogenea, and Sven is not aware of that, but I am certain he shall be after it is posted.

So Sven Longshanks is out of prison, and now his period of internet and social media restrictions is expired, for which reason he was able to get into contact with me, and to begin podcasting once again, which happened almost exactly two months ago. But as our title states this evening, he is not quite free, and that is because nobody in Britain is free. Britain has actually become a prison island for its own citizens.

Another friend of ours, whom I will not name, had recently planned on coming to the United States to vacation, and had hoped that maybe he could visit us and some other friends. He has never had issues with speech online, or any other activities that are considered unlawful by the British government. But since he is unmarried and self-employed, the British government decided that his travel request should be denied, explaining that because he did not have enough substance or enough of a connection to keep him in Britain, such as a house or property or employment, that they were afraid that he might not return. That is not a home, it is indeed a literal prison, from which a man may not easily escape even if he wanted to, something which our friend did not want.

In addition to these situations, in September of 2025 the rather mainstream media outlet, Forbes magazine, had published an article with the headline People Are Being Thrown In U.K. Prisons Over What They’ve Said Online. Can Free Speech Be Saved? The article is said to have been written by Steve Forbes himself, the Chairman of the company and editor-in-chief of the magazine. This is the same Steve Forbes who had attempted to run for U.S. President a couple of times in the late 1990’s. He was initially responding to the arrest of an Irish comedian in the U.K. for what he described as “the ‘crime’ of three politically incorrect tweets”.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 55: The Report of the Gospel

Isaiah 52:7 – 53:1

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 55: The Report of the Gospel

In our last presentation, Behold, it is I!, we focused on statements found in Isaiah chapter 51, where the Word of Yahweh had said “I, even I, am he that comforteth you” (51:12) and here in Isaiah chapter 52 where He said: “Therefore my people shall know my name: therefore they shall know in that day that I am he that doth speak: behold, it is I” (52:6). These passages we sought to cross-reference to many similar statements which are found elsewhere here in Isaiah, and in the words of Christ in the accounts of the Gospel, which together serve to establish the fact that Yahshua Christ is indeed Yahweh God incarnate. In support of these assertions, in 1 Timothy chapter 3 we read:

14 These things write I unto thee, hoping to come unto thee shortly: 15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth. 16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the [Nations], believed on in the world, received up into glory.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 54: Behold, it is I!

Isaiah 51:12 - 52:7

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 54: Behold, it is I! 

Here we are only about halfway into Isaiah chapter 51, and we tarried for two weeks on the first half of the chapter, because we find it necessary to properly correlate these promises which had been made to the children of Israel in captivity, after they had been divorced and alienated from Yahweh their God, to the messages of redemption, salvation and reconciliation which are found in the Gospel of Christ. As Paul of Tarsus had written in Ephesians chapter 2, the Church of God is “20 … built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone”, and speaking of a mystery in Ephesians chapter 3, he declared:

5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6 That the [Nations] should be fellow heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel.

This is where we differ from all denominational Christians and from the eighteen-hundred-year-old interpretations of the traditional churches, which do not agree with the writings of the apostles. The promises to Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah and Jacob all indicate that only the seed of Jacob would inherit the promises and blessings of Abraham, and that through Jacob the seed of Abraham found in the later twelve tribes of Israel would become a great nation, and a company of nations, which would be eternally blessed by God. In Luke chapter 11, Christ Himself expressed the Divine commission of both prophets and apostles alike, implying that the messages of both groups would be harmonious, where He said “49 Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute”, so they would both be equally hated for their common message. Therefore, we cannot interpret the words of the apostles in any manner which is contrary to the words of the prophets, and if there is an alternate, harmonious interpretation, that is the only interpretation which we may accept, so long as we are honest and seek truth.

European Fellowship Forum, December 2025

Thanks to all who participated! A partial description of the subjects discussed:

The fallen angels, the Michael of Scripture, National Socialism and Hitler, Christian obligations and responsibilities. The Soviet threat, Hitler’s predicament and failures. The traitors in National Socialist Germany. Here Harald, who was born and raised in East Germany, helped fill in a lot of facts which contribute to an understanding of the failure of NS Germany. Folly of NS Germany pact with Japan.

Participation in the usury based economy vs. need for survival, the difference between participating and profiting vs. suffering and tolerating the usury economy. Jewish/corporate objectives to force all of the West into a Chinese-style form of corporate communism. Contributions of technical advancement and party politics contributions to that endeavor. AIPAC money and near-total congressional control. The assassinations of AfD politicians, brainwashing of society in Germany, Police are zogbots.

Society, the role of women , in the spreading of truth, as examples for the moral guidance of society and in the raising of families. Thoughts are prayers, Yahweh knows all the thoughts of one’s heart, so they cannot be distinguished. Sheep and goats, judgment and motivation.

The value of modern education. Decadence in colleges and military. Impact and causes of inflation since the 1940’s. Presence of women in police, the military and the general workplace beginning with the glorification of women in the workplace in the wartime 1940’s.

Leadership and organization in a Christian community, what the apostles truly left as opposed to the Word of God and the warnings in the Parable of the Trees of the Forest.

Sven Longshanks and some of his recent experiences following his travail with the British government, as well as some of his experiences with British prison.

Some of the theories of L.A. Waddell, author of early 20th century books such as The Phoenician Origin of Britons Scots and Anglo-Saxons and The British Edda: A Journey Through Time. The Eddas, the Aesir and Vanir and my theory on their identity. Sarmatians, Slavs, Scythians and Germanic tribes in relation to the promises of Abraham and Noah’s words in Genesis chapter 9. 

Immanuel Velikovsky, Zechariah Sitchin and some of their theories. Barry Fell and America BC. Early exploration of North America by Vikings, Danes, and even Celts.

The need for repentance from seeking earthly kings.

And more!

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 53: The Redeemed of Yahweh

Isaiah 51:8-11

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 53: The Redeemed of Yahweh

In Isaiah chapter 41 the Word of Yahweh turned from the events surrounding Judah and Jerusalem, and began to address the isles and coastlands, which are the places where the children of Israel would be found after the time of the Assyrian captivities. Many had also escaped Palestine by sea, and others had settled the Mediterranean coasts much sooner, which we had discussed in relation to The Burden of Tyre much earlier in Isaiah’s writing, where Yahweh had also admonished them, that they would not be forgotten. However, from that chapter forward, the context in the narrative of Isaiah really has no clear break until the opening verse of chapter 49, where the Word of Yahweh once again begins to addresses the same people and says “Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far,” so even that is not really a break in the context at all but seems to be more of a reminder of who it is that He is addressing. Then, while He had addressed the isles and coastlands, at the same time Yahweh continually addressed Jacob and Israel, so they remain His subject and concern throughout Isaiah, and it cannot be imagined that He is speaking to any people other than Israel in captivity. None of the promises found throughout these chapters of Isaiah are relevant to any other people. The isles or coastlands who would await His law and His light are the places where He had expected to find the children of Israel. 

This is illustrated even further where chapter 50 opens, and the children of Israel in captivity are challenged to produce their mother’s bill of divorcement, their mother being an allegory for their nation, and again here in chapter 51 where in the opening verses they are told to look to their ancestors, Abraham and Sarah. So nearly eight hundred years after the time of Isaiah, when Paul of Tarsus had written his epistle to the Romans, he explained in Romans chapter 4 that the promise the Abraham’s seed had already become many nations by his time was fulfilled “as it is written”, and he told his readers that Abraham was their forefather, according to the older Greek manuscripts, or their father, in the medieval Byzantine manuscripts, “as pertaining to the flesh”, so Abraham was their natural, genetic forefather, as well as the forefather of the remnant of Judah in Judaea. The Israelites of the captivity who had forsaken the law, for which reason they were sent into captivity, had become the “uncircumcision” of Paul’s epistles, while the Israelites of Judaea who had aspired to keep the law were the “circumcision” of his epistles. 

Topical Discussions, December, 2025

 

Topical Discussions, December, 2025

Here I am going to take another break from our Isaiah commentary and instead endeavor to treat a few subjects which arise continually, and although I have treated them in the past, in places such as the Christogenea Forum or from various perspectives in diverse commentaries, most of those are not as complete a treatment as I may be able to do here. However for some of these subjects, which are the pagan nature of Christmas and the inaccurate dating of the birth of Christ by the churches, it is also a discussion which is seasonable. We shall also discuss our reasoning for our interpretation of the Biblical Hebrew calendar. But first I want to address something which is taken for granted because it is repeated very often in social media, and even in print media and books.

Here we shall discuss three subjects, or actually four: By Way of Deception Christians Should Not Interpret Scripture, Reckoning the Dates for the Passover and the Day of the Sabbaths, How Christmas is Pagan and Dating the Birth of Christ. Our presentation of the last two subjects is hopelessly intertwined. 

 

By Way of Deception Christians Should Not Interpret Scripture

That is the motto of the subversive jewish agency known as the Mossad, which is typically said to read "By way of deception you shall wage war", and it seems that most people take for granted the jewish claim that this motto is a citation from Proverbs 24:6. So first, we shall cite Proverbs chapter 24:

1 Be not thou envious against evil men, neither desire to be with them. 2 For their heart studieth destruction, and their lips talk of mischief. 3 Through wisdom is an house builded; and by understanding it is established: 4 And by knowledge shall the chambers be filled with all precious and pleasant riches. 5 A wise man is strong; yea, a man of knowledge increaseth strength. 6 For by wise counsel thou shalt make thy war: and in multitude of counsellors there is safety. 7 Wisdom is too high for a fool: he openeth not his mouth in the gate. 8 He that deviseth to do evil shall be called a mischievous person. 9 The thought of foolishness is sin: and the scorner is an abomination to men. 10 If thou faint in the day of adversity, thy strength is small. 11 If thou forbear to deliver them that are drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be slain; 12 If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? and shall not he render to every man according to his works?

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 52: The Comfort of Zion

Isaiah 51:1-7

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 52: The Comfort of Zion

While discussing Your Mother’s Divorcement, where we had taken a phrase that is found in the opening verse of Isaiah chapter 50 for the title of our discussion of the chapter, we had seen that even in their state of bereavement, having been put away by Yahweh their God, who had been the Husband of their nation, the children of Israel had nevertheless been given hopes of redemption and deliverance. Then, for most of the balance of that chapter, there is a description which, in hindsight, is clearly a Messianic prophecy describing a man who would suffer shame and reproach, but who would ultimately overcome his enemies by the power of God. In the final verses of the chapter, those who fear Yahweh and obey His servant, the promised Messiah, would have hope, but those who were self-reliant and would attempt to walk in their own light, rather than await the light of God, would die in sorrow. 

In the course of our discussion of that chapter, we hope to have illustrated the fact that the allegory of the marriage relationship between Yahweh God and the children of Israel as a nation is really much more than an allegory: it is a fact of history which transcends history itself. It is certain in many ways in Scripture, that Yahweh God does not care for the standards set by men. According to His Word, He is both the Husband and the King of the children of Israel, and that arrangement began in the wedding vows taken at Sinai which are described in the Book of Exodus. 

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 51: Your Mother’s Divorcement

Isaiah 50:1-11

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 51: Your Mother’s Divorcement 

In our last discussion of Isaiah and the final portion of Isaiah chapter 49, we hope to have demonstrated how the children of Israel had moved to A Place of Their Own, as the prophet Nathan had much earlier communicated to king David, in 2 Samuel chapter 7, and as Isaiah had prophesied in that chapter, where he also indicated that in captivity, the children of Israel would multiply greatly, and their enemies would shrink from them, in verse 19 where we read: “19 For thy waste and thy desolate places, and the land of thy destruction, shall even now be too narrow by reason of the inhabitants, and they that swallowed thee up shall be far away.” Then he indicated that they would seek to migrate to a different location, where we then read: “20 The children which thou shalt have, after thou hast lost the other, shall say again in thine ears, The place is too strait for me: give place to me that I may dwell.” The subsequent verses then describe Israel as “desolate, a captive, and removing to and fro”, which is also indicative of their becoming a migratory people and leaving the places of their captivity and making a new home in another land.

In recent portions of this Commentary, we have already cited Isaiah chapter 66 in reference to this outcome, where we read in reference to these same people: “19 And I will set a sign among them, and I will send those that escape of them unto the nations, to Tarshish, Pul, and Lud, that draw the bow, to Tubal, and Javan, to the isles afar off, that have not heard my fame, neither have seen my glory; and they shall declare my glory among the [Nations].” As we had said, all of these places are located in the north and west, from the coasts of the Black Sea to Anatolia and then west to modern Italy and Iberia. Historically, beginning about a hundred years after the time of Isaiah, from the fall of Assyria the people known as Khumri or Kimmerians did migrate in that direction, and they were followed by their kindred for several centuries, who were also known by the names Sakae, Scythian and Galatae, but later as Saxons, Goths, Alans or or by numerous other and later names.

November 2025 Open Forum Discussion

What follows is a brief list of some of the topics discussed in the Forum:

  • An experience for an Identity Christian marrying into a Catholic family.

  • Necromancy, Saul and Samuel, was it really Samuel?

  • Artaxerxes, Cambyses and Cyrus and the use or appearance of these names in Ezra and Nehemiah.

  • Los Lunas Inscription – Is it real?

  • Born again and the Catholic Vulgate.

  • Marcion and Ebionites rejecting portions of Scripture.

  • Kings mentioned in Daniel and chapters apparently out of order.

  • Necromancy – the dynamic is different after Christ than it had been before Christ.

  • Jephtha’s daughter dedicated to tabernacle in wilderness, not slain.

  • Missing data in books of Kings and Chronicles?

  • Strabo and White Syrians, Neo-pagan attitudes towards the Classics.

  • Strabo, Idumaeans and Nabataeans.

  • Dan, Danaans, Cyrus Gordon, Jewish attitudes towards archaeological truths.

  • Jewish media dehumanization of Christians, just as they dehumanized Nazis.

  • Schindler’s List is a fictional work.

  • Orthodox Jews and welfare fraud.

  • White altruism coupled with Jewish gaslighting prevents Whites from seeing Jewish evil.

  • Chemtrails were patented to inhibit “global warming” by Hughes Aircraft Co. in 1990.

  • Christianity, Goths and Alans.

  • Are Jews behind the rise in “antisemitism” in ways that are not obvious?

  • Christianity and the Crusades as a weak and late response to Islamic conquest.

  • Diminishing beef supply in United States

  • Treaty of Arbroath, Remonstrance of the Irish Kings, Milesians from Phoenicia

  • Arabs in Siciliy and Italy early 9th century, but in Greece too?

  • Descriptions of yellow-haired Greeks, Phoenicians in Classical and Hellenistic literature.

  • If Jesus was a Jew, Jews would worship Jesus…

And more!

Challenging Orthodoxy: Further Scriptural Witnesses Against the Trinity Doctrine

Challenging Orthodoxy: Further Scriptural Witnesses Against the Trinity Doctrine

Ever since I began the commentary on the Gospel of John back in 2018, which was an endeavor that took me nearly two full years to complete, I have wanted to do certain topical programs which condensed particular subjects that are prominent in the Gospel of John into single topical presentations. In my estimation, the Gospel of John was the last one written, and was purposely written in a way which sets it apart from the synoptic Gospels. The apostle John illustrated teachings both about Christ and from Christ which the synoptic Gospels only represent superficially, or had excluded entirely. So I view John as a retrospective account of the Gospel, as John seems to have read the others, and chose to fill in many of the gaps from the substance and ministry of Christ which were left unrecorded in the synoptic gospels. One of those subjects is the nature of Christ Himself, so that John provides much of the evidence against the later so-called trinity doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. But for some time I procrastinated, having been busy with other projects, so it has been seven years, at least, since I first realized a need to do this, and when I finally began to prepare for this discussion, I honestly thought it would only be a single presentation. However doing that first presentation, I had to stop at about eleven thousand words, because I ran out of writing time, and that left several thousand words of notes for Scriptures that were left without mention. Therefore, here we are with a second discussion challenging the trinity doctrine, and I shall try not to repeat much of what I had said in the first discussion.

But when I finally resolved to discuss this subject of the so-called trinity here three weeks ago, it had been precipitated by a certain presumed friend who has continually accosted me, attempting to correct me for what he perceives to be my shortcomings. While we have been acquainted in social media for many years, he even joined the Christogenea Chat back in August, just to argue with me about his trinity doctrine, which he holds precious, and now he has once again badgered me in social media. But he also continually and rather consistently misrepresents me and my positions on the issue, probably because he has not actually read my papers. However, certain people seem to have a difficult time reading and grasping things which they find disagreeable, and now after several long back-and-forth discussions with this individual, I am convinced that he is one of them. He claims to admire my work, but he really only admires it to the point where he agrees, and then he thinks he has some divine commission to demand that I change where he does not agree. While I continue to disagree, in essence, his attitude is that he knows everything, and he can correct me because I don’t know what I am talking about. It is actually arrogant for such a man to keep confronting me when I refuse his correction.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 50: A Place of Their Own

Isaiah 49:17-26

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 50: A Place of Their Own

In the first portion of Isaiah chapter 49 we discussed The Light of the Nations in relation to both the Gospel of Christ, and those for whom the Gospel had been intended, who are the children of Israel and Judah who were in captivity in the islands and coastlands of the West. It is they who were explicitly addressed in the opening verses of the chapter. Then in the course of that discussion, we also hope to have demonstrated the fact that Paul of Tarsus had received a notable commission from Christ Himself to bring the Gospel to those nations, who were the greater number of the scattered children of Israel, not only from the Assyrian captivity, but from as early as the captivity of Egypt, and all of the people who had left by sea to settle abroad during the intervening periods of the Judges and the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. 

In the 8th century BC, western Europe as well as the rivers and seas to the north, were an object of exploration for both Greeks and Phoenicians, but the Phoenicians had already dominated the western Mediterranean, so the Greeks were constrained from that area and from safely reaching the Ocean. The Romans were not yet sailors, as the Roman historian Titus Livius explained in his History of Rome, that they learned ship-building and sailing rather late, in the 3rd century BC, so that they could fight a war against the Carthaginians. So in the later portion of the 7th century BC the Greeks founded a colony at Cyrene, on the coast of Egypt near the Nile Delta, and then at Marseilles, on the Mediterranean coast of France. At Marseilles, there is evidence of an earlier Phoenician presence. In that same century, Greeks had also founded colonies on the coast of the Black Sea both in the Crimea and at the mouth of the Danube River.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 49: The Light of the Nations

Isaiah 49:1-16

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 49: The Light of the Nations

Discussing the last six chapters of Isaiah, from the middle of chapter 43, Babylon and its fall to the Persians, as well as the related issue of the Persian policy which had paved the way for the rebuilding of Jerusalem, is the significant theme throughout all of them. The fall of ancient Babylon is certainly the central event in the near-vision fulfillment of this prophecy since Cyrus, the then-future king of Persia, was explicitly named and his role in its fall was described. But as we have also explained, those events did not fulfill all of the descriptions found concerning the fall of Babylon in these prophecies of Isaiah. Therefore, as we had further explained, it is evident that these prophesies of Isaiah have a greater purpose than the end of the relatively short-lived Neo-Babylonian empire, and for that, much of the language concerning Babylon here is repeated in reference to the fall of the entity which is called Mystery Babylon in the Revelation of Yahshua Christ.

So in that manner, Babylon becomes more than the name of the ancient city, as it is often used as an allegory representing the captivity of Israel as well as the series of world empires which would rule over the children of Israel in their time of punishment, a time which would last for many centuries. For that reason, at a time when the children of Judah were in captivity in Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had a dream where he had seen a fearsome vision of a beast made of four different metals. So the prophet Daniel had described and interpreted that vision for Nebuchadnezzar, where we read in part, from Daniel chapter 2:

36 This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king. 37 Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory. 38 And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold. 39 And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth. 40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.

Challenging Orthodoxy: Scriptural Witnesses Against the Trinity Doctrine

Challenging Orthodoxy: Scriptural Witnesses Against the Trinity Doctrine

Before I begin, I must repeat something I have stated very frequently over the past few decades, which is that no part of Scripture is a lie. One verse of Scripture does not disprove another verse. If there is a perceived conflict, sometimes it is a corrupt text, which, on occasion, can be rectified by examining ancient manuscripts. Sometimes it is merely a poor translation which is more easily corrected upon examining the original languages. Sometimes it is a poor understanding of the context in which . But much more frequently than any of these, is a poor understanding on the part of the reader, and a lack of knowledge which is rectified only through further study. Therefore all of the “gotcha” verses which a scoffer may pull out of his pocket to refute our claims here this evening, do not prove what the scoffers think they prove.

Yes, Christ, the man, often prayed to God the Father, and often spoke of God the Father, from the perspective of a man. But that which He had done, He did as an example to men. When He washed the feet of His disciples, He said, as it is recorded in John chapter 13: “15 For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you.” Then, in 1 Peter chapter 1 we read: “21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: 22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: 23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously”, so that likewise, we would strive to live as He had lived, without sin and committing ourselves to His judgment. For that reason, to serve as an example for men, during His earthly ministry He behaved just as a man should behave, and not as God. After His resurrection, he was recognized as God. Yahshua Christ did not become a god, but rather, He is God who became a man, and His Resurrection proved that He is God. When the apostle Thomas had realized that it was Christ who was resurrected from the dead, he responded by declaring “My Lord and my God!” The prophet Isaiah was read in the synagogues, Christ Himself read from Isaiah and declared one Messianic prophecy to have been fulfilled in Himself, so men knew the other prophecies concerning their promised Redeemer, and they understood that those prophecies were fulfilled in Christ.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 48: The Furnace of Affliction

Isaiah 48:1-22

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 48: The Furnace of Affliction

Discussing the Visions of Babylon in our last presentation in Isaiah we had made several assertions concerning the interpretation of prophecy. The Bible offers us very little direct instruction in this area, outside of the examples which are found in the interpretations of the prophets in the words of Christ and the writings of His apostles. Therefore, I can only offer my own opinion, and attempt to explain my own methods. But as I have also tried to warn, attempts to determine the course of future events from prophecies of events which may or may not have already been fulfilled in the past is in itself a form of idolatry, especially if they are used to develop concrete expectations, which, in turn, may even become points of doctrine. That is because men having such expectations may plan and build their lives around them, and if the expected events do not come to pass, or at least, if they do not happen as expected, then those men have labored in vain. We should not want to cause any of our brethren to labor in vain, even if vanity is ultimately inevitable, to one degree or another and in one aspect of life or another.

However the truth of the assertion that there are prophecies in scripture which have more than one fulfillment is indeed demonstrable in may ways even if, lacking a full knowledge of history, we may not be able to determine every one of the precise details by which certain prophecies have already been fulfilled. So while there are always some things to which we may remain blind, because our knowledge of the remote past is not perfect or complete, there are also other things that we may see clearly with what knowledge which we do have of the past, and know how certain prophecies had been fulfilled.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 47: Visions of Babylon

Isaiah 47:1-15

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 47: Visions of Babylon

In our last presentation in Isaiah, we had explained that from the message of comfort for Jerusalem which is found in chapter 40, the overall context in the remaining chapters of Isaiah is a series of prophecies concerning the fate of the children of Israel in captivity, as well as the means of their reconciliation in the promises of a coming Savior and Redeemer of Israel, or, to use a word which Isaiah had not used in that context, the coming Messiah. However a more immediate context here in these chapters of Isaiah, from chapter 44, is the prophecy of Cyrus, the then-future Persian king who conquered Babylon about a hundred and sixty years after Isaiah had written these chapters.

Here Babylon has not been mentioned since Isaiah chapter 43, where the Word of Yahweh had stated that “14 Thus saith the LORD, your redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; For your sake I have sent to Babylon, and have brought down all their nobles, and the Chaldeans, whose cry is in the ships.” There we asserted that those words have more significance as a far-vision prophecy, comparing language concerning shipping and merchants in the prophecy of the fall of Mystery Babylon in Revelation chapter 18. But of course, there is also a near-vision fulfillment, although that could not have been fulfilled until some time in Isaiah’s future, since Babylon was not a threat to the kingdom of Judah in Isaiah’s lifetime. The act of the Babylonians having sent an embassy to Jerusalem to meet with Hezekiah is indicative of Babylonian intentions to break from the Assyrian empire, which is also evident in other historical records, however that did not occur for at least another seventy years.

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 46: The Failure of Idols

Isaiah 46:1-13

A Commentary on Isaiah, Part 46: The Failure of Idols

We might understand the attitudes and the poor understanding of judaized Christians who have been imbued with the lies of the Church and all of the denominations it has spawned over these last 1800 years. However there is nothing more disappointing than to see Identity Christians reject the notion that all Israel shall be saved, in spite of their sins. However this is much more than a mere notion: It is an explicit promise which is expressed in various ways in many passages of Scripture, and especially in the words of the prophets. So here in Isaiah chapter 45, there are two unequivocal promises of universal salvation for the children of Israel, which are first evidenced in the words: “17 But Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation: ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded world without end.” Then in the final verse of the chapter we read: “25 In the LORD shall all the seed of Israel be justified, and shall glory.” Only a rebellious soul could twist these words into something other than what they plainly mean.

However in the development of Roman Catholicism, there were many such rebellious souls even when they did not mean to be rebellious. Over the centuries, doctrines had been contrived of heaven and hell and purgatory which are not founded in the Scriptures, and they have been used to control people as well as for men to profit from them. The priesthood set themselves up as idols, proclaiming that their baptism and their rituals alone can save men and grant them an entry to heaven. Essentially, they claim that their authority must rule over men, for men to continue in the salvation which they purport to bestow upon them with their rituals. Then in order to help maintain their pretense of authority, they offer actual idols, representations of the creation found in so-called “saints”, unto which men prostrate themselves and pray for mercy or forgiveness, as if God Himself cannot hear our unworthy voices, and we need some plaster statue intercessor, artificial representations of men or women who could not even save themselves.

William Finck with JermWarfare on UKColumn: The biblical history of the Jews

For various reasons, I really needed to take a break this week, with no offense to Isaiah – and I hope to continue the Isaiah commentary next Friday. So this evening I will present my most recent Jerm Warfare discussion. This podcast was pre-recorded on August 26th, 2025, and the video was published by Jerm at the UKColumn website on September 4th. By agreement, UKColumn discourages their hosts from sharing their data, so out of courtesy I have waited a month to share it here, and would have waited longer if I had not needed the time this week.

This particular podcast probably could have been better. We spent 12 days on the road, then I had a Friday evening Open Forum the day after we got home, and in the meantime my little brother rolled into the swamp for a three-day visit so I couldn’t get a break, but for which at the same time I certainly cannot complain. We spent more time than we had together in 40 years, for which I am extremely grateful. Then Tuesday morning I was up at 6AM Central time so that I could wake up and get enough coffee into me for this promised 8AM recording. I am not really much of a morning person, and this particular morning I was still quite tired.

Download the video.